Suppose I was to craft a story about
the relationship of humans and Rheas through a typical beginning, conflict,
climax and end format: the story could become very human-centrist and omit
certain facts. Rheas would, not
surprisingly, be very silent on their opinion on the nature of their
relationship to humans. For example, I
wanted the narrative I am working on for my internship to explain how Rheas
influenced Charles Darwin’s On the Origins
of Species, but I wound up talking more about Darwin. I wanted to talk about Rheas survived the
plumage trade, but I ended up writing more about early members of the Audubon
society.
How was I to create an engaging story
while staying truthful and giving Rheas their fair time? I realized that connecting legacies to the
past and the various people that helped conserve the species would be secondary
to the task of balancing conservation history and wildlife history. And the point of conserving history along with
wildlife is to reveal an equally authentic and dependent relationship between
people and Rheas.
It is for this reason that I chose to
use a narrative that stated that people and Rheas were equally dependent on each
other, using mythology, the theory of evolution and the plumage trade as my
major themes. I did this by organizing
raw data, then narrating and mediating that data, and then ending with my
conclusion. For mythology, I mentioned
the various insults in Brazil for the way a Rhea ran, but then showed that
there were indigenous tribes that revered the Rhea. For the theory of evolution, I used Darwin’s
notes on two different Rhea species to demonstrate how Rheas influenced the beginnings
of the Darwin’s ideas. Yet, I showed how
these notes at their beginning were disjointed and barley coherent until Rheas
were studied again and again. For the
plumage trade, I highlighted the amount of Rheas killed to make dusters and
brooms. But I used an analogy from one
of my key sources, Birds and People,
that the destruction of Rheas by the undisciplined use of technology ended up
being equally destructive to humans in World War One. It is not a coincidence that much legislation
protecting bird species were created right before and after this second
carnage. I finally concluded by tying these
themes together with the turn-of-the-century event of the first two Rheas entering
the Philadelphia Zoo.
This natural history of Rheas was
limited in how much it explained. I did
not want to distract from the intention of the studbook to give reliable
data. However, I hopefully made the
topic more reachable to the human mind while at the same time I did not loose
sight that this project was about Rheas more so than humans.
A
Scene in South America with Rheas and Patagonian Cavies.,” NYPL Digital Collections,
accessed May 13, 2019,
http://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47d9-7a67-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99.



