Update - New Projects, New Lessons
Preface
It has been quite a while since my last post! Autumn has (more or less) settled in, with winter not too far off, and likewise my internship at the National Gallery of Art has also gone through some change. Working within a research library is bound to have new projects in managing such a collection. While taking on new responsibilities can be daunting in its own regard, it is also an opportunity to learn from both successes & failures in that process. As you read through these new experiences encountered during my internship, take time to think beyond your goals, expectations, and the initial logistics of learning your job, at least for a brief moment.
How actively can you receive feedback for your work? Can you balance new work responsibilities while maintaining your academic obligations? As you have continued your internship, how have you been able to manage with both the workplace environment? Does your actual work flow have different pacing from how the job was initially described?
These questions are just some of the questions you could be asking yourself in regards to your internship, especially if you're considering work within public institutions such as libraries & museums. I'd like to frame this update around the idea of change since the work within libraries (maybe surprising for some!) is always changing, with slower weeks, faster weeks, and weird weeks. Keep this mind as you read!
Updates on Existing Projects
Telework
Currently, I am doing research on our Evans-Tibbs artists and sourcing for their wikidata pages. While there has not been much of a change in responsibilities for this project, managing this project while the National Gallery of Art has moved into Phase II has changed. With the museum moving to Phase II, there is now a requirement for the majority of my hours to be on-site.
While switching to a new schedule posed its own challenges, it was important to manage my expectations when completing research on these artists -- and especially making sure to communicate this with my supervisor. It was through our conversation that this project was not a time-sensitive project & like any project I've worked on, it was always quality over quantity.
And with less hours allotted for telework, this would also ultimately mean less records processed for the Auction Catalogs project. This doesn't mean that I can't try to make the most out of this; I try to split my time teleworking so that the majority is spent on artist research since it is a more involved process . This project requires a bit of overview of Wikidata's various terms. Likewise, editing for Wikidata means sourcing according to both Wikidata & the project's standard. For me, this meant checking over common databases for sources, checking the statements to see if it matches the property fields on the spreadsheet.
While this may getting more into the technical details, it is important to consider that the tasks within a museum & library environment is detailed-oriented. As I have received new responsibilities, it has influence on how I'm able to work on other projects.
In-Person Work
- Regular Tasks -
Overall, there are three central responsibilities at the Vertical Files - labeling new materials, returning materials and, while doing this, seeing what artists & institutions are ready to 'graduate' into their own folders & creating records for them. For a good while now, filing these materials into drawers creates a practical issue, especially as the collection has been around for decades: SPACE
With the Vertical Files' drawers getting tighter, it's harder to file materials. So it is important to weed materials that don't fit the standard - for us, it is primarily weeding materials over 50 pg (verifying this through WorldCat), duplicates, paper copies of popular publications and other oddities. Sometimes, the drawers you're weeding are (mostly) fine, but just filled with stuff - this will require knowing what to unfold, what needs protective sheets and other tidying. In many ways, organizing & protecting a collection of ephemera brings new & unique issues. Some materials are very damaged to where you may question why it is even there. Others are loose materials that might be completely unidentifiable. Even in new tasks where you expect the unexpected, there are little nuances & peculiar things that you might've never considered.
- Cross-department Tasks -
Recently, I had the chance to work with my co-worker, Charlotte, on a new project for the Auction Catalogs department of the library. Keeping a collection of auction catalogs shows how art is sold, how it moves across the world, the kind of places which these works are sold, and so much more! This time, we recently had a large donation of materials from one of the gallery's curators. It was up to me to sort these materials to figure out which belonged better to the Vertical Files, Auction Catalogs collection and what didn't fit at all. Working with co-workers during this time has been exciting, especially when it makes you learn about what drives others' passion in their work. I've also learned that making friends is not too hard either!
As a simple task that could be completed in a few hours, it still does require a bit in analyzing these materials. On the surface, many might see a magazine for an auction house as the same as a catalog -- but for a researcher, the distinction is important and necessary to get valuable information. There are some tasks that can only be completed on-site, even if they may seem simple. These things can be spring up on you and you have to be prepared, but luckily you have others around you who can assist with every question - big, small and extra small. In the last blog post, I talked about shelving for the Circulation team as they had a backlog of books being returned at the Fall's beginning.
As a brief aside, the telework project on Auction Catalogs previously mentioned is also cross-departmental.
- Annual Review & Closure -
Having worked here for basically a full year, it was time for my annual review. This is something that some work place environments require and there can be a bit of bureaucracy involved - there was quite a bit of writing when it came to making my own self-reflection document - listing elements that were critical & non-critical. There was a need to talk over the job description's responsibilities, whether they were accurate, going over specific goals, being scored to the position's guidelines and all the sort! What is important however is that the communication about the work I've been doing had already been quite consistent & regular between my supervisor and I. In many ways, this process made more sense for a permanent employee than an intern & that set the tone for our annual review.
Annual and semi-annual reviews may seem daunting, but they're actually a great opportunity to communicate difficulties, long-term goals and address over-arching questions about your job. Honesty in presenting yourself and the work you're proud of can make for a stellar review and going over what might be expected of you later. It is important to see this not as a moment to be harsh & overly-self critical, but as a moment to just...talk about your job!
With this being said, going through this internship this long has shown me much of what I expect from future career prospects. I hope that this has given you a bit of insight into museum & library-related careers - that under each institution, there is a network of different departments, people and systems working to maintain these collections. They might seem static on the outside, but there is a world of change beneath it all.