As the Spring 2022 semester draws to a close, my work in UMBC's Special Collections department with the Lewis Hine collection of photographs continues. I have previously described the scope of my digitization work and its importance, especially at a time when travel and access to material is limited.
The digitization is nearing the halfway point - since beginning my internship in March, I and another student have photographed the back of almost two thousand of the approximately five thousand prints in UMBC's Hine collection. I will keep photographing them over the summer; others on the team in Special Collections have already begun some of the rehousing work associated with the project and the NEH grant. Just as my work is preserving the prints' contents digitally, the rehousing work will help to protect the physical media. I may have an opportunity to help with that part of the project later in the summer.
I have gained some interesting new skills through this internship. In addition to clarifying my understanding of the mechanics of copy stand photography, I have gained some wonderful insight about the work that goes into digitizing records for research use. As a student and researcher who often relies on digital versions of the sources I use for my own projects, it is helpful to be on the other side of the desk, to understand all of the moving pieces involved in a request to scan or otherwise document some record in an archive.
A portion of my work feels very mechanical: add the print's metadata to the project spreadsheet, place the print on the copy stand, take a photograph of its verso [its back], crop the resulting image, and save the new digital photograph in the database drive. Other aspects of my work, though, are fascinating and unusual just like the best research problems and projects that I enjoy outside of this internship. What's the best workflow for this task I need to complete? What states and cities will we visit with today's section of Hine prints? They are organized based on their object number, rather than their subject matter, so it's possible for one session of digitization to involve a whirlwind tour of as many as five or six destinations.
Hine spent a lot of time documenting mill workers in New England, fishermen, crabbers and oyster shuckers along the coast, and agricultural workers in the deep south. Given the diversity of industry in many of the places Hine visited, it seems surprising (and sad) that despite his travel to cities and areas which have majority Black populations, there are vanishingly few Black subjects in the prints I've encountered so far. As Hine's work looks at child labor, the oversight seems especially egregious. Where are the Black children toiling long hours in factories, or in the fields? Is this gap in his subject an intentional one on Hine's part, or just an accident?
I do not have those answers.
The Hine collection is fascinating, even for someone like me who has very little free time. On their surfaces, the prints are often blurry, chaotic images of a single child or group of children looking small and proud and defiant. The contextual information from Hine on the back of each print is also important, in a different way. I am eager to continue digitizing the backs of these images through the summer!
